<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TOP SECRET!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.ruhlman.com/2007/07/top-secret.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.ruhlman.com/2007/07/top-secret.html</link>
	<description>Translating the Chef&#039;s Craft for Every Kitchen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:58:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sebastian dunne</title>
		<link>http://blog.ruhlman.com/2007/07/top-secret.html/comment-page-1#comment-47109</link>
		<dc:creator>sebastian dunne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruhlman.com/newblog/2007/07/top-secret.html#comment-47109</guid>
		<description>Can anyone tell me the link for the original Bourdain piece on Ray?  Thanks in advance.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can anyone tell me the link for the original Bourdain piece on Ray?  Thanks in advance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobby</title>
		<link>http://blog.ruhlman.com/2007/07/top-secret.html/comment-page-1#comment-47108</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruhlman.com/newblog/2007/07/top-secret.html#comment-47108</guid>
		<description>I guess Anthony Bourdain wasn&#039;t too far off in his Top Secret post.  Look at the article written in the Bergen Record a couple of days ago.  The link is attached.  http://njmg.typepad.com/foodblog/2007/08/next-food-netwo.html.

The article can be summed up in the two paragraphs below:

Food Network discarded votes
&quot;If you voted for Rory Schepisi to be “The Next Food Network Star,” your vote may not have counted after all.

The Food Network said this week that it discarded all 36 hours’ worth of text-message voting for its reality show after a glitch caused votes for Schepisi to initially be rejected.&quot;


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess Anthony Bourdain wasn&#8217;t too far off in his Top Secret post.  Look at the article written in the Bergen Record a couple of days ago.  The link is attached.  <a href="http://njmg.typepad.com/foodblog/2007/08/next-food-netwo.html" rel="nofollow">http://njmg.typepad.com/foodblog/2007/08/next-food-netwo.html</a>.</p>
<p>The article can be summed up in the two paragraphs below:</p>
<p>Food Network discarded votes<br />
&#8220;If you voted for Rory Schepisi to be “The Next Food Network Star,” your vote may not have counted after all.</p>
<p>The Food Network said this week that it discarded all 36 hours’ worth of text-message voting for its reality show after a glitch caused votes for Schepisi to initially be rejected.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skawt</title>
		<link>http://blog.ruhlman.com/2007/07/top-secret.html/comment-page-1#comment-47107</link>
		<dc:creator>Skawt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruhlman.com/newblog/2007/07/top-secret.html#comment-47107</guid>
		<description>O-kay.

First, attacking people instead of ideas makes you a troll.  Second, you&#039;re in IT and you use AOL - no real tech would be caught dead using AOL.  Third, you see in everyone else what you are guilty of.  Fourth, you post numerous messages under different names to either insult people or make ridiculous, unnecessary sexual posts no one is interested in.  Fifth, you make threats to &quot;reveal&quot; information about me that is publicly available on the internet.

Finally, cyberstalking is illegal.  I am not chasing anyone.  I am participating on a blog.  You are polluting it.

If you&#039;re through with me, fine.  Go away.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>O-kay.</p>
<p>First, attacking people instead of ideas makes you a troll.  Second, you&#8217;re in IT and you use AOL &#8211; no real tech would be caught dead using AOL.  Third, you see in everyone else what you are guilty of.  Fourth, you post numerous messages under different names to either insult people or make ridiculous, unnecessary sexual posts no one is interested in.  Fifth, you make threats to &#8220;reveal&#8221; information about me that is publicly available on the internet.</p>
<p>Finally, cyberstalking is illegal.  I am not chasing anyone.  I am participating on a blog.  You are polluting it.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re through with me, fine.  Go away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cranky Observer</title>
		<link>http://blog.ruhlman.com/2007/07/top-secret.html/comment-page-1#comment-47104</link>
		<dc:creator>Cranky Observer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruhlman.com/newblog/2007/07/top-secret.html#comment-47104</guid>
		<description>Both of you need to put your e-peens away and stand down. This is Ruhlman&#039;s blog, not an Internet pissing contest.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both of you need to put your e-peens away and stand down. This is Ruhlman&#8217;s blog, not an Internet pissing contest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skawt</title>
		<link>http://blog.ruhlman.com/2007/07/top-secret.html/comment-page-1#comment-47105</link>
		<dc:creator>Skawt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruhlman.com/newblog/2007/07/top-secret.html#comment-47105</guid>
		<description>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyberstalking
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyberstalking" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyberstalking</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: papi</title>
		<link>http://blog.ruhlman.com/2007/07/top-secret.html/comment-page-1#comment-47106</link>
		<dc:creator>papi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruhlman.com/newblog/2007/07/top-secret.html#comment-47106</guid>
		<description>&quot;Posted by: Skawt &#124; August 08, 2007 at 05:44 PM&quot;

Ironic, considering you&#039;re the one who goes cyber-chasing (on Ruhlman&#039;s blog) people throughout thread-after-thread, and topic-after-topic, in pursuit of anyone who posts opinion and/or fact to the contrary; whether about Ruhlman, Bourdain, your cronies, or your own pathetic self.

And now, you&#039;re turning the other cheek (which means, you were turned out a long time ago)?

Why, of course: You&#039;re also a master of the passive-aggressive, with this latest paranoid manifestation of your own being a clear illustration.

In sum, it&#039;s a good thing you posted the URL: if anything, to remind everyone and your own self (if the latter is possible), of how off-the-rails you truly are.

I&#039;m done with you, and continue have fun being the pretend pitbull of Ruhlman&#039;s blog, you cyber-Pillsbury doughboy: it&#039;s the closest you&#039;ll ever get to knowing any personal glory.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Posted by: Skawt | August 08, 2007 at 05:44 PM&#8221;</p>
<p>Ironic, considering you&#8217;re the one who goes cyber-chasing (on Ruhlman&#8217;s blog) people throughout thread-after-thread, and topic-after-topic, in pursuit of anyone who posts opinion and/or fact to the contrary; whether about Ruhlman, Bourdain, your cronies, or your own pathetic self.</p>
<p>And now, you&#8217;re turning the other cheek (which means, you were turned out a long time ago)?</p>
<p>Why, of course: You&#8217;re also a master of the passive-aggressive, with this latest paranoid manifestation of your own being a clear illustration.</p>
<p>In sum, it&#8217;s a good thing you posted the URL: if anything, to remind everyone and your own self (if the latter is possible), of how off-the-rails you truly are.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m done with you, and continue have fun being the pretend pitbull of Ruhlman&#8217;s blog, you cyber-Pillsbury doughboy: it&#8217;s the closest you&#8217;ll ever get to knowing any personal glory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: papi</title>
		<link>http://blog.ruhlman.com/2007/07/top-secret.html/comment-page-1#comment-47103</link>
		<dc:creator>papi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruhlman.com/newblog/2007/07/top-secret.html#comment-47103</guid>
		<description>SKAWT:

It&#039;s likely that I work in Info Tech, too; but not because I was a Culinary School failure, like you.

Stand down, sonny boy, with your idle threats, because you&#039;re way out of your league - unless, of course, you have a desire to be outed right here on the enclave: all of your info (which really lies in the Public Domain) is right here, just ready for the posting.

Regards to you &amp; your wife.

PS: As for Bourdain, he needs no defenders, and can more than handle himself.  You&#039;re not getting paid to lick his jockstrap clean, are you?

As for Ruhlman, kudos to him for both the best blog in the culinary world, as well as for letting free expression reign: even idiots like you, scawt, are allowed to express themselves.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SKAWT:</p>
<p>It&#8217;s likely that I work in Info Tech, too; but not because I was a Culinary School failure, like you.</p>
<p>Stand down, sonny boy, with your idle threats, because you&#8217;re way out of your league &#8211; unless, of course, you have a desire to be outed right here on the enclave: all of your info (which really lies in the Public Domain) is right here, just ready for the posting.</p>
<p>Regards to you &#038; your wife.</p>
<p>PS: As for Bourdain, he needs no defenders, and can more than handle himself.  You&#8217;re not getting paid to lick his jockstrap clean, are you?</p>
<p>As for Ruhlman, kudos to him for both the best blog in the culinary world, as well as for letting free expression reign: even idiots like you, scawt, are allowed to express themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ms.Anthrope</title>
		<link>http://blog.ruhlman.com/2007/07/top-secret.html/comment-page-1#comment-47101</link>
		<dc:creator>Ms.Anthrope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruhlman.com/newblog/2007/07/top-secret.html#comment-47101</guid>
		<description>Skawt wrote:
&quot;And no, I&#039;m not talking about Ruhlman, either. ;-)&quot;

Well...you never know. It&#039;s pretty easy to change your handle with TypePad. :-) Maybe all these posts are really Ruhlman&#039;s own creation...and it&#039;s just THAT kind of thinking that makes me want to pull the sheets over my head. Ack!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Skawt wrote:<br />
&#8220;And no, I&#8217;m not talking about Ruhlman, either. <img src='http://blog.ruhlman.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> &#8221;</p>
<p>Well&#8230;you never know. It&#8217;s pretty easy to change your handle with TypePad. <img src='http://blog.ruhlman.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  Maybe all these posts are really Ruhlman&#8217;s own creation&#8230;and it&#8217;s just THAT kind of thinking that makes me want to pull the sheets over my head. Ack!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skawt</title>
		<link>http://blog.ruhlman.com/2007/07/top-secret.html/comment-page-1#comment-47102</link>
		<dc:creator>Skawt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruhlman.com/newblog/2007/07/top-secret.html#comment-47102</guid>
		<description>Nope, it&#039;s not Ruhlman, it&#039;s Papi and a slew of aliases.  He&#039;s trolling the blog.  And will stop if he doesn&#039;t want his employer finding out.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope, it&#8217;s not Ruhlman, it&#8217;s Papi and a slew of aliases.  He&#8217;s trolling the blog.  And will stop if he doesn&#8217;t want his employer finding out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chat</title>
		<link>http://blog.ruhlman.com/2007/07/top-secret.html/comment-page-1#comment-47098</link>
		<dc:creator>Chat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruhlman.com/newblog/2007/07/top-secret.html#comment-47098</guid>
		<description>theme site lince looks nice
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>theme site lince looks nice</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ms.Anthrope</title>
		<link>http://blog.ruhlman.com/2007/07/top-secret.html/comment-page-1#comment-47099</link>
		<dc:creator>Ms.Anthrope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruhlman.com/newblog/2007/07/top-secret.html#comment-47099</guid>
		<description>Errr...Skawt, I think Steamy Kitchen was referring to Ruhlman.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Errr&#8230;Skawt, I think Steamy Kitchen was referring to Ruhlman.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skawt</title>
		<link>http://blog.ruhlman.com/2007/07/top-secret.html/comment-page-1#comment-47100</link>
		<dc:creator>Skawt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruhlman.com/newblog/2007/07/top-secret.html#comment-47100</guid>
		<description>Ms.Anthrope:

I was referring to someone else, actually.  Typified by multiple ranting posts with a decisive love/hate theme aimed squarely at Bourdain.  Also tends to be vitriolic towards anyone else that comments either positively or negatively about Tony.

And no, I&#039;m not talking about Ruhlman, either.  ;-)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ms.Anthrope:</p>
<p>I was referring to someone else, actually.  Typified by multiple ranting posts with a decisive love/hate theme aimed squarely at Bourdain.  Also tends to be vitriolic towards anyone else that comments either positively or negatively about Tony.</p>
<p>And no, I&#8217;m not talking about Ruhlman, either.  <img src='http://blog.ruhlman.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skawt</title>
		<link>http://blog.ruhlman.com/2007/07/top-secret.html/comment-page-1#comment-47097</link>
		<dc:creator>Skawt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruhlman.com/newblog/2007/07/top-secret.html#comment-47097</guid>
		<description>Oh, good, another kook obsessed with Tony and sexual commentary.  Too bad there isn&#039;t an ignore feature on typepad where individual comments can be blocked from being read.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, good, another kook obsessed with Tony and sexual commentary.  Too bad there isn&#8217;t an ignore feature on typepad where individual comments can be blocked from being read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sarah</title>
		<link>http://blog.ruhlman.com/2007/07/top-secret.html/comment-page-1#comment-47095</link>
		<dc:creator>sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruhlman.com/newblog/2007/07/top-secret.html#comment-47095</guid>
		<description>Purple Afghani-- right on.  I&#039;m already addicted to HBO Food, and it doesn&#039;t even exist yet.

And man, I&#039;d really love to see Alton Brown given more of a free hand.  Bourdain&#039;s show allows him to speak a lot more freely than he did on the FN, as do his books of course, and he&#039;s got some damn interesting things to say.  I&#039;d love to see Alton go that route as well.  The FN has such a talent for recruiting the best minds in the food world and then totally refusing to let them do their thing, to the point where they can&#039;t wait to get out of there!

Stop underestimating your audience, FN.  Seriously.  We WANT thought-provoking ideas and cultural analysis.  We want MORE nutritional anthropologists.  What we don&#039;t need is any more damn commercials disguised as editorials!  And no, I don&#039;t care how they make Bubble Yum!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Purple Afghani&#8211; right on.  I&#8217;m already addicted to HBO Food, and it doesn&#8217;t even exist yet.</p>
<p>And man, I&#8217;d really love to see Alton Brown given more of a free hand.  Bourdain&#8217;s show allows him to speak a lot more freely than he did on the FN, as do his books of course, and he&#8217;s got some damn interesting things to say.  I&#8217;d love to see Alton go that route as well.  The FN has such a talent for recruiting the best minds in the food world and then totally refusing to let them do their thing, to the point where they can&#8217;t wait to get out of there!</p>
<p>Stop underestimating your audience, FN.  Seriously.  We WANT thought-provoking ideas and cultural analysis.  We want MORE nutritional anthropologists.  What we don&#8217;t need is any more damn commercials disguised as editorials!  And no, I don&#8217;t care how they make Bubble Yum!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steamy Kitchen</title>
		<link>http://blog.ruhlman.com/2007/07/top-secret.html/comment-page-1#comment-47096</link>
		<dc:creator>Steamy Kitchen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruhlman.com/newblog/2007/07/top-secret.html#comment-47096</guid>
		<description>Ok. I have to admit something. I&#039;ve read your books. I&#039;ve seen you in snippits on TV here and there (just saw you on Ming&#039;s show), but haven&#039;t really been to your blog. I&#039;ve always imagined that you are a very serious guy. A very quiet-slightly-smiles-at-corners-of-mouth type of guy.

But no, you&#039;re quite humorous and light hearted.  And very handsome indeed!


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok. I have to admit something. I&#8217;ve read your books. I&#8217;ve seen you in snippits on TV here and there (just saw you on Ming&#8217;s show), but haven&#8217;t really been to your blog. I&#8217;ve always imagined that you are a very serious guy. A very quiet-slightly-smiles-at-corners-of-mouth type of guy.</p>
<p>But no, you&#8217;re quite humorous and light hearted.  And very handsome indeed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frances</title>
		<link>http://blog.ruhlman.com/2007/07/top-secret.html/comment-page-1#comment-47094</link>
		<dc:creator>Frances</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruhlman.com/newblog/2007/07/top-secret.html#comment-47094</guid>
		<description>Wow, head on a platter. That is about 60% gross and 40% creepy. Maybe she just phrased it wrong? Maybe. Could be.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, head on a platter. That is about 60% gross and 40% creepy. Maybe she just phrased it wrong? Maybe. Could be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susanne</title>
		<link>http://blog.ruhlman.com/2007/07/top-secret.html/comment-page-1#comment-47093</link>
		<dc:creator>Susanne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruhlman.com/newblog/2007/07/top-secret.html#comment-47093</guid>
		<description>Here’s one for you all....Ms Amy Finley tells Star magazine that she would like to serve up her head on a platter to Anthony Bourdain. Because... “He’s a big fan of French food, like I am.” Eeeew.

Now that’s a sure fire hit show for FN! Would love to see the ‘Headless Gourmet Next Door’....With all of the fancy-ass French dishes out there Amy picks her own head? Way to go Food Network!

So you guys don’t have to run out and buy yourselves a STAR magazine I’ve thrown a scan up on my blog (even though it has nothing to do with bags)

http://susannemaddux.wordpress.com/tag/the-nothing-to-do-with-bags-category/
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here’s one for you all&#8230;.Ms Amy Finley tells Star magazine that she would like to serve up her head on a platter to Anthony Bourdain. Because&#8230; “He’s a big fan of French food, like I am.” Eeeew.</p>
<p>Now that’s a sure fire hit show for FN! Would love to see the ‘Headless Gourmet Next Door’&#8230;.With all of the fancy-ass French dishes out there Amy picks her own head? Way to go Food Network!</p>
<p>So you guys don’t have to run out and buy yourselves a STAR magazine I’ve thrown a scan up on my blog (even though it has nothing to do with bags)</p>
<p><a href="http://susannemaddux.wordpress.com/tag/the-nothing-to-do-with-bags-category/" rel="nofollow">http://susannemaddux.wordpress.com/tag/the-nothing-to-do-with-bags-category/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sorcha</title>
		<link>http://blog.ruhlman.com/2007/07/top-secret.html/comment-page-1#comment-47092</link>
		<dc:creator>Sorcha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruhlman.com/newblog/2007/07/top-secret.html#comment-47092</guid>
		<description>Do, t-scape, it&#039;s really good. And yes, you can get buttered tea there. Though whether it&#039;s actual yak butter, I don&#039;t know, since I haven&#039;t seen any yaks around Portland. Not any of the four-legged variety, anyway. ;)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do, t-scape, it&#8217;s really good. And yes, you can get buttered tea there. Though whether it&#8217;s actual yak butter, I don&#8217;t know, since I haven&#8217;t seen any yaks around Portland. Not any of the four-legged variety, anyway. <img src='http://blog.ruhlman.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: papi</title>
		<link>http://blog.ruhlman.com/2007/07/top-secret.html/comment-page-1#comment-47091</link>
		<dc:creator>papi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruhlman.com/newblog/2007/07/top-secret.html#comment-47091</guid>
		<description>&quot;If everyone is posting about Tibet, it is highly probable we all know the story. Bourdain told a story by simply using one word: Tibet. With that one word, we all had our minds on the reality there.
Mr Bourdain, I&#039;d say job excellently done with chefly efficiency.

Posted by: CarolinaGirl &#124; July 31, 2007 at 02:37 PM&quot;

It&#039;s pathetic how, every other poster here ATTEMPTS to &quot;sound&quot; like Bourdain -- he&#039;s a master of prose through his own hard work: seek your own identity, because you don&#039;t wear it well.

It stinks of self-consciousness, whereas, Bourdain&#039;s is as natural as unprocessed food.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If everyone is posting about Tibet, it is highly probable we all know the story. Bourdain told a story by simply using one word: Tibet. With that one word, we all had our minds on the reality there.<br />
Mr Bourdain, I&#8217;d say job excellently done with chefly efficiency.</p>
<p>Posted by: CarolinaGirl | July 31, 2007 at 02:37 PM&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s pathetic how, every other poster here ATTEMPTS to &#8220;sound&#8221; like Bourdain &#8212; he&#8217;s a master of prose through his own hard work: seek your own identity, because you don&#8217;t wear it well.</p>
<p>It stinks of self-consciousness, whereas, Bourdain&#8217;s is as natural as unprocessed food.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: t-scape</title>
		<link>http://blog.ruhlman.com/2007/07/top-secret.html/comment-page-1#comment-47090</link>
		<dc:creator>t-scape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruhlman.com/newblog/2007/07/top-secret.html#comment-47090</guid>
		<description>I have not, Sorcha. I&#039;ll have to keep an eye out for it!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have not, Sorcha. I&#8217;ll have to keep an eye out for it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
